i5-3570S vs Opteron 6281

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6281
2012, $988
16 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
4.16
+55.2%
Core i5-3570S
2012, $285
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.68

Opteron 6281 outperforms Core i5-3570S by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15751951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.270.38
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.351.74
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$988$285

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-3570S has 41% better value for money than Opteron 6281.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size2x 315 mm2133 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 6281 4.16
+55.2%
i5-3570S 2.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 6281 7279
+55.2%
Samples: 1
i5-3570S 4689
Samples: 325

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.16 2.68
Recency 1 May 2012 1 June 2012
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Opteron 6281 has a 55.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i5-3570S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The AMD Opteron 6281 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i5-3570S in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6281 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-3570S is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6281
Opteron 6281
Intel Core i5-3570S
Core i5-3570S

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Opteron 6281 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 181 votes

Rate Core i5-3570S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 6281 and Core i5-3570S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.