A8-7650K vs Opteron 6281
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6281 outperforms A8-7650K by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1579 | 2259 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 1.35 | 0.79 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2015 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $988 | $152 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
A8-7650K has 15% better value for money than Opteron 6281.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 245 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 2,411 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | FM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| DualGraphics | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-2133 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 384 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6281 and A8-7650K.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.16 | 1.78 |
| Recency | 1 May 2012 | 7 January 2015 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Opteron 6281 has a 134% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
A8-7650K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 37% lower power consumption.
The AMD Opteron 6281 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-7650K in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 6281 is a server/workstation processor while A8-7650K is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
