Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Opteron 6278

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.54
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
38.80
+354%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Opteron 6278 by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking99985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.14no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency7.1613.37
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 May 2012 (13 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$988no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)128 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size2x 315 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 6278 8.54
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 38.80
+354%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 6278 13733
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62374
+354%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.54 38.80
Recency 1 May 2012 14 July 2020
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 280 Watt

Opteron 6278 has 143.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, on the other hand, has a 354.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6278 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 24 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 92 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 6278 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.