i5-12400F vs Opteron 6278

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.97
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.76
+42.3%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Opteron 6278 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking865616
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.55
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.1117.90
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size316 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6278 8.97
i5-12400F 12.76
+42.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6278 13733
i5-12400F 19532
+42.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.97 12.76
Recency 1 May 2012 4 January 2022
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

Opteron 6278 has 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

i5-12400F, on the other hand, has a 42.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6278 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6278 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6278 and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 12 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 13208 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6278 or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.