7 150UL vs Opteron 6276
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1708 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.68 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.33 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (14 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Core 7 150UL.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
Opteron 6276 has 60% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
7 150UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 6276 and Intel Core 7 150UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while Core 7 150UL is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
