Xeon 6960P vs Opteron 6274
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6960P outperforms Opteron 6274 by a whopping 2212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1914 | 17 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.19 | 6.32 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (14 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $909 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB (shared) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8.00391 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 432 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 80 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | G34 | FCLGA7529 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 500 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 3 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 12 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6274 and Xeon 6960P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.30 | 76.31 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 72 |
| Threads | 16 | 144 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 500 Watt |
Opteron 6274 has 335% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6960P, on the other hand, has a 2212% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6960P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6274 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
