Xeon D-1518 vs Opteron 6220
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6220 outperforms Xeon D-1518 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1810 | 1838 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.68 | 1.69 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon D |
| Power efficiency | 1.00 | 3.14 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 9 March 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $523 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon D-1518 has 149% better value for money than Opteron 6220.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | 80 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 3,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | G34 | FCBGA1667 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| GPIO | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.124 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6220 and Xeon D-1518.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 6 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.96 | 2.84 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 9 March 2015 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 35 Watt |
Opteron 6220 has a 4.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.
Xeon D-1518, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Opteron 6220 and Intel Xeon D-1518.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
