Atom Z540 vs Opteron 6212
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6212 outperforms Atom Z540 by a whopping 1646% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2058 | 3650 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.29 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.83 | 2.29 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Silverthorne (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (14 years ago) | 2 April 2008 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $266 | $160 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540 have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 0.07 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 533.33 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 14 |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 24.18 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.75 -1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | G34 | PBGA441 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 2.4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6212 and Atom Z540.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.27 | 0.13 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 2 April 2008 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 2 Watt |
Opteron 6212 has a 1646% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z540, on the other hand, has 5650% lower power consumption.
The AMD Opteron 6212 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z540 in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 6212 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z540 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
