EPYC 4584PX vs Opteron 4340
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 138 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 55.91 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.06 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (13 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 4340 and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4340 and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | C32 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4340 and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4340 and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4340 and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 4340 and EPYC 4584PX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 December 2012 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
| Threads | 6 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
Opteron 4340 has 26.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4584PX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 4340 and AMD EPYC 4584PX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
