Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Opteron 4334

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 4334
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.56
+17.4%
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.18

Opteron 4334 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1600 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17211839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameSeoul (2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date4 December 2012 (11 years ago)25 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache288 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2209.8 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketC32FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 4334 2.56
+17.4%
Ryzen Embedded R1600 2.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 4334 3949
+17.4%
Ryzen Embedded R1600 3365

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.56 2.18
Recency 4 December 2012 25 February 2020
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Opteron 4334 has a 17.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded R1600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 4334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R1600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 4334 and Ryzen Embedded R1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron  4334
Opteron 4334
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 4334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 33 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 4334 or Ryzen Embedded R1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.