Athlon XP-M 950 vs Opteron 4334
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2027 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 1.00 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (13 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 4334 and Athlon XP-M 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 0.95 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9.5 |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4334 and Athlon XP-M 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | C32 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 16 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4334 and Athlon XP-M 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4334 and Athlon XP-M 950 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4334 and Athlon XP-M 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 16 Watt |
Opteron 4334 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 950, on the other hand, has 493.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 4334 and AMD Athlon XP-M 950. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon XP-M 950 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
