Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Opteron 4310 EE
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $415 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 9900 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | C32 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 December 2012 | 17 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Opteron 4310 EE has 57.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7840HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 4310 EE is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7840HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 4310 EE and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
