Xeon L7345 vs Opteron 3380
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2004 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Delhi (2012−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (13 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 8 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 66 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon L7345.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 December 2012 | 1 July 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Opteron 3380 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 103% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon L7345, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 3380 and Intel Xeon L7345. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
