Xeon E5-1607 vs Opteron 3365

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 3365
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.68
+9.8%

Opteron 3365 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17201783
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.761.71
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012−2013)no data
Release dateJune 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)10 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data64 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.6V - 1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data375 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 3365 2.68
+9.8%
Xeon E5-1607 2.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 3365 4105
+10%
Xeon E5-1607 3731

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron 3365 423
Xeon E5-1607 510
+20.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron 3365 1974
+20.1%
Xeon E5-1607 1643

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.68 2.44
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

Opteron 3365 has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 3365 and Xeon E5-1607, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 3365
Opteron 3365
Intel Xeon E5-1607
Xeon E5-1607

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1607 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 3365 or Xeon E5-1607, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.