EPYC 9115 vs Opteron 3365
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9115 outperforms Opteron 3365 by a whopping 1110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1791 | 145 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 40.16 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 3.75 | 23.59 |
| Architecture codename | Delhi (2012−2013) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | June 2013 (11 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $726 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM3+ | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3365 and EPYC 9115.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.56 | 30.98 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Opteron 3365 has 92.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9115, on the other hand, has a 1110.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 9115 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 3365 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
