Ryzen 3 1100 vs Opteron 250
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3243 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.18 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | December 2004 (20 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 250 and Ryzen 3 1100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 4800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 250 and Ryzen 3 1100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 940 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 250 and Ryzen 3 1100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 250 and Ryzen 3 1100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 3 1100 has 300% more physical cores, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 250 and AMD Ryzen 3 1100. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 250 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 1100 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
