Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Opteron 240
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 215 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.16 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | April 2003 (22 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 38 |
| Threads | 1 | 76 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 57 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 940 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 38 |
| Threads | 1 | 76 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 270 Watt |
Opteron 240 has 217.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has 3700% more physical cores and 7500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 240 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
