Duron 600 vs Opteron 240 EE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 240 EE and Duron 600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Spitfire (2000−2001)
Release dateFebruary 2004 (20 years ago)19 June 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$112

Detailed specifications

Opteron 240 EE and Duron 600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz0.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data6
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size193 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors106 million25 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 240 EE and Duron 600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket940A
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt27.4 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 240 EE and Duron 600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 27 Watt

Opteron 240 EE has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 600, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 240 EE and Duron 600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron 240 EE is a server/workstation processor while Duron 600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 240 EE and Duron 600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 240 EE
Opteron 240 EE
AMD Duron 600
Duron 600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 240 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Duron 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 240 EE or Duron 600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.