Ryzen 3 5425U vs Opteron 152

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 152
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 104 Watt
0.27
Ryzen 3 5425U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.16
+2552%

Ryzen 3 5425U outperforms Opteron 152 by a whopping 2552% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3144998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency0.2545.15
Architecture codenameVenus (2004−2005)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date2 August 2005 (19 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die size115 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors114 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939FP6
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 152 0.27
Ryzen 3 5425U 7.16
+2552%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 152 428
Ryzen 3 5425U 11367
+2556%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 7.16
Recency 2 August 2005 6 January 2022
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 5425U has a 2551.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 593.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 5425U is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 152 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 152 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5425U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 152 and Ryzen 3 5425U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 152
Opteron 152
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
Ryzen 3 5425U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 152 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 228 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5425U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 152 or Ryzen 3 5425U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.