Xeon 6781P vs N250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

N250
2025
4 cores / 4 threads
2.82
Xeon 6781P
2025, $8,960
80 cores / 160 threads, 350 Watt
67.39
+2290%

Xeon 6781P outperforms N250 by a whopping 2290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking192721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.73
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiencyno data8.12
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataGranite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date1 January 2025 (1 year ago)24 February 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,960

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

N250 and Xeon 6781P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)80
Threads4160
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache336 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 3 nm
Die sizeno data2x 598 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on N250 and Xeon 6781P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N250 and Xeon 6781P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

N250 and Xeon 6781P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N250 and Xeon 6781P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N250 and Xeon 6781P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of N250 and Xeon 6781P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by N250 and Xeon 6781P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by N250 and Xeon 6781P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N250 and Xeon 6781P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes9136
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

N250 2.82
Xeon 6781P 67.39
+2290%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

N250 4934
Samples: 63
Xeon 6781P 117946
+2290%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.82 67.39
Recency 1 January 2025 24 February 2025
Physical cores 4 80
Threads 4 160

Xeon 6781P has a 2289.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 1900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6781P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel N250 in performance tests.

Be aware that N250 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6781P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N250
N250
Intel Xeon 6781P
Xeon 6781P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 24 votes

Rate N250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6781P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors N250 and Xeon 6781P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.