Xeon 6972P vs N200
Primary details
Comparing N200 and Xeon 6972P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1599 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Power efficiency | 50.63 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Granite Rapids (2024) |
Release date | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
N200 and Xeon 6972P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 96 |
Threads | 4 | 192 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 480 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 80 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and Xeon 6972P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | FCBGA1264 | 7529 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 500 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Xeon 6972P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
GPIO | + | no data |
Security technologies
N200 and Xeon 6972P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Xeon 6972P are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Xeon 6972P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | N/A |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 32 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Xeon 6972P integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Xeon 6972P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by N200 and Xeon 6972P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Xeon 6972P.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 9 | 96 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2023 | 24 September 2024 |
Threads | 4 | 192 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 500 Watt |
N200 has 8233.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6972P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 4700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between N200 and Xeon 6972P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that N200 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6972P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Xeon 6972P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.