Xeon 656 vs N200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1957not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency18.65no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataGranite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date1 January 2023 (3 years ago)2 February 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

N200 and Xeon 656 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data20
Threads440
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache72 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 3 nm
Die sizeno data2x 598 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on N200 and Xeon 656 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Xeon 656. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

N200 and Xeon 656 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Xeon 656 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Xeon 656. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Xeon 656 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Xeon 656 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by N200 and Xeon 656 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Xeon 656.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes9128
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2023 2 February 2026
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 40
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 210 Watt

N200 has 3400% lower power consumption.

Xeon 656, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel N200 and Intel Xeon 656. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that N200 is a notebook processor while Xeon 656 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N200
N200
Intel Xeon 656
Xeon 656

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 53 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 656 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors N200 and Xeon 656, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.