Ultra 5 225F vs N200
Primary details
Comparing N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1576 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 51.11 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) | January 2025 |
Detailed specifications
N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 21 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| GPIO | + | no data |
Security technologies
N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | N/A |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 32 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 20 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
N200 has 983.3% lower power consumption.
Ultra 5 225F, on the other hand, has 150% more threads.
We couldn't decide between N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that N200 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Core Ultra 5 225F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
