Atom x7809C vs N200
Primary details
Comparing N200 and Atom x7809C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1631 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 50.10 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $117 |
Detailed specifications
N200 and Atom x7809C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and Atom x7809C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Atom x7809C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Atom x7809C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Atom x7809C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Atom x7809C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2023 | 8 April 2024 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
N200 has 316.7% lower power consumption.
Atom x7809C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between N200 and Atom x7809C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Atom x7809C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
