Xeon 6710E vs N100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
3.03
Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.75
+1047%

Xeon 6710E outperforms N100 by a whopping 1047% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1799116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.03
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency21.497.21
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataSierra Forest (2024)
Release date1 January 2023 (2 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

N100 and Xeon 6710E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data4 MB (per module)
L3 cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache96 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on N100 and Xeon 6710E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1264FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N100 and Xeon 6710E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

N100 and Xeon 6710E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N100 and Xeon 6710E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N100 and Xeon 6710E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of N100 and Xeon 6710E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by N100 and Xeon 6710E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by N100 and Xeon 6710E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N100 and Xeon 6710E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes988
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

N100 3.03
Xeon 6710E 34.75
+1047%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

N100 5361
Samples: 3314
Xeon 6710E 61404
+1045%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.03 34.75
Recency 1 January 2023 3 June 2024
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 205 Watt

N100 has 3316.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6710E, on the other hand, has a 1046.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel N100 in performance tests.

Be aware that N100 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N100
N100
Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 344 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors N100 and Xeon 6710E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.