3 N350 vs N100
Aggregate performance score
Core 3 N350 outperforms N100 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1655 | 1332 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 53.96 | 66.09 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 1 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
N100 and Core 3 N350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on N100 and Core 3 N350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N100 and Core 3 N350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| GPIO | + | + |
Security technologies
N100 and Core 3 N350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N100 and Core 3 N350 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N100 and Core 3 N350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel® Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | 1.35 GHz |
| Execution Units | 24 | 32 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of N100 and Core 3 N350 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by N100 and Core 3 N350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | 4096 x 2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | 4096 x 2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by N100 and Core 3 N350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N100 and Core 3 N350.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 9 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | 2.0/3.2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.38 | 4.83 |
| Recency | 1 January 2023 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
N100 has 16.7% lower power consumption.
3 N350, on the other hand, has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Intel Core 3 N350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel N100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
