Pentium M 733 vs Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3
Primary details
Comparing Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Pentium M 733 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | PowerPC G4 | Pentium M |
Architecture codename | 7447 | Dothan (2004−2005) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Pentium M 733 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Bus rate | 133 MHz | 400 MHz |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 90 nm |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Pentium M 733 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 90 nm |
Pentium M 733 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Pentium M 733. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Pentium M 733, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.