Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3
Primary details
Comparing Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 545 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | PowerPC G4 | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | 7447 | no data |
| Release date | no data | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 133 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 7.3 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Motorola PowerPC G4 G4 1.3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
