Celeron T1600 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron SI-40
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.20

Celeron T1600 outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32783111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile Sempronno data
Power efficiency0.760.92
Architecture codenameSable (2008−2009)no data
Release date4 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHzno data
Bus rate1800 MHzno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g2PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125Vno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.34
Recency 4 July 2008 1 October 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Mobile Sempron SI-40 has 40% lower power consumption.

Celeron T1600, on the other hand, has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The Celeron T1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-40 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40
Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7
35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9
8 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron T1600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.