Processor N200 vs Mobile Pentium 4 552
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2026 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Pentium 4 | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Alder Lake-N |
| Release date | no data | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Mobile Pentium 4 552 outperforms Processor N200 by 231% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
