Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
2003
1 core / 2 threads, 70 Watt
0.13
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 55 Watt
17.43
+13308%

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 by a whopping 13308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3586404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency0.0813.39
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Strix Halo (2025)
Release dateJune 2003 (22 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.07 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache8 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors55 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket478FP11
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 8050S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 0.13
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 17.43
+13308%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 220
Samples: 16
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 30641
+13828%
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 17.43
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has a 13307.7% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 27.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.