EPYC 9745 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
2003
1 core / 2 threads, 60 Watt
0.16
EPYC 9745
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 400 Watt
94.08
+58700%

EPYC 9745 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 by a whopping 58700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.49
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency0.2522.40
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Turin (2024)
Release dateJune 2003 (21 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)128
Threads2256
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache8 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors55 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 0.16
EPYC 9745 94.08
+58700%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 264
EPYC 9745 150920
+57067%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 94.08
Physical cores 1 128
Threads 2 256
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 400 Watt

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has a 58700% higher aggregate performance score, 12700% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9745 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9745 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 and EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.