Processor N100 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Aggregate performance score
Processor N100 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by a whopping 1057% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3229 | 1776 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 0.32 | 38.33 |
| Architecture codename | Newark (2003) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | August 2003 (21 year ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $128 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 10 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 2.43 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N100 has a 1057.1% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 933.3% lower power consumption.
The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
