Athlon 64 3500+ EE vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Orleans (2007−2009)
Release dateAugust 2004 (21 years ago)February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K128 KB
L2 cache512K512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data90 nm
Die size193 mm2183 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754AM2
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB35 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 64 3500+ EE has 1362.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and AMD Athlon 64 3500+ EE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 3500+ EE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ EE
Athlon 64 3500+ EE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3500 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.