EPYC 8434PN vs Mobile A A110
Primary details
Comparing Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Mobile A | no data |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,150 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | 663-ball micro-FCBGA | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 June 2007 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 155 Watt |
Mobile A A110 has 5066.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8434PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile A A110 is a notebook processor while EPYC 8434PN is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile A A110 and EPYC 8434PN, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
