Xeon 6960P vs Microsoft SQ1
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6960P outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a whopping 2080% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1692 | 17 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Qualcomm Snapdragon | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.28 |
| Designer | Microsoft | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 2 October 2019 (6 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 432 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 80 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA7529 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 500 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 3 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 12 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon 6960P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.41 | 74.34 |
| Recency | 2 October 2019 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 72 |
| Threads | 8 | 144 |
Xeon 6960P has a 2080.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6960P is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.
Be aware that Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6960P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
