Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Microsoft SQ1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 3000 Watt
3.73
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
18.62
+399%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a whopping 399% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1484324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragonno data
Power efficiency0.1261.76
Architecture codenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)Strix Point (2024)
Release date2 October 2019 (5 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)3000 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardQualcomm Adreno 685AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Microsoft SQ1 3.73
Ryzen AI 9 365 18.62
+399%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Microsoft SQ1 5822
Ryzen AI 9 365 29018
+398%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Microsoft SQ1 537
Ryzen AI 9 365 8446
+1473%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Microsoft SQ1 4276
Ryzen AI 9 365 45453
+963%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Microsoft SQ1 14.2
Ryzen AI 9 365 6.7
+112%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Microsoft SQ1 2875
Ryzen AI 9 365 11304
+293%

WebXPRT 3

Microsoft SQ1 116
Ryzen AI 9 365 322
+178%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.73 18.62
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3000 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 365 has a 399.2% higher aggregate performance score, 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 10614.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Microsoft SQ1
SQ1
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 36 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Microsoft SQ1 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.