Ultra 5 250K Plus vs Microsoft SQ1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1759not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragonno data
DesignerMicrosoftIntel
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)Arrow Lake Refresh (2026)
Release date2 October 2019 (6 years ago)11 March 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads818
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)W125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardQualcomm Adreno 685Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Microsoft SQ1 6039
Samples: 79
Ultra 5 250K Plus 52057
+762%
Samples: 3

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Microsoft SQ1 537
Ultra 5 250K Plus 11921
+2120%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Microsoft SQ1 4276
Ultra 5 250K Plus 93637
+2090%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Microsoft SQ1 14.2
Ultra 5 250K Plus 3.29
+332%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2019 11 March 2026
Physical cores 8 18
Threads 8 18
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm

Ultra 5 250K Plus has an age advantage of 6 years, 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Microsoft SQ1 and Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 59 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 250K Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Microsoft SQ1 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.