Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 838 by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1828 | 786 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mediatek MediaTek Kompanio | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Designer | no data | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 31 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 6 MB + 16 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | ARM Mali-G57 MP3 | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.03 | 11.28 |
| Recency | 31 May 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 33.3% more physical cores.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220, on the other hand, has a 272.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 50% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 838 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
