EPYC 9745 vs MediaTek Kompanio 520
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9745 outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 4749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2013 | 3 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.49 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | MediaTek Kompanio 500 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.49 |
| Designer | no data | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | no data | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $12,141 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
MediaTek Kompanio 520 and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 128 |
| Threads | 8 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on MediaTek Kompanio 520 and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and EPYC 9745.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.94 | 94.08 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 128 |
| Threads | 8 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
EPYC 9745 has a 4749.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 9745 is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Be aware that MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9745 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
