Xeon W-3235 vs M3-8100Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.25
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core M3Intel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data8.63
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameAmber Lake (2018−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date28 August 2018 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$1,398

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeOPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1633
L1 cache128 KB768 KB
L2 cache512 KB12 MB
L3 cache4 MB19.25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size16 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 615no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1064

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 August 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 4 24
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 180 Watt

M3-8100Y has 3500% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3235, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel M3-8100Y and Intel Xeon W-3235. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that M3-8100Y is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel M3-8100Y
M3-8100Y
Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate M3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M3-8100Y and Xeon W-3235, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.