Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs M3-8100Y
Primary details
Comparing M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core M3 | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Amber Lake (2018−2019) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 28 August 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | no data |
Detailed specifications
M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon 880M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.98 | 19.76 |
| Recency | 28 August 2018 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 28 Watt |
M3-8100Y has -75% more threads, and 460% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has 898% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between M3-8100Y and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
