EPYC 9355 vs K6-2E+/400ICR

VS

Primary details

Comparing K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD K6-2+no data
Architecture codenameK6-III (1999−2000)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,694

Detailed specifications

K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed0.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate100 MT/sno data
Multiplier4.0no data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography0.18 µm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)16.5 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 280 Watt

K6-2E+/400ICR has 1650% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that K6-2E+/400ICR is a notebook processor while EPYC 9355 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between K6-2E+/400ICR and EPYC 9355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD K6-2E+/400ICR
K6-2E+/400ICR
AMD EPYC 9355
EPYC 9355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate K6-2E /400ICR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about K6-2E+/400ICR or EPYC 9355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.