Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs K6-2+ 500ACZM

VS

Primary details

Comparing K6-2+ 500ACZM and M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Architecture codenameSharptooth (2000)no data
Release date18 April 2000 (24 years ago)30 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

K6-2+ 500ACZM and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads114
Boost clock speed0.5 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache128 KBno data
Chip lithography180 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistors21 millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on K6-2+ 500ACZM and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAMD Super Socket 7no data
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by K6-2+ 500ACZM and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by K6-2+ 500ACZM and M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 32-core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2000 30 November 2024
Physical cores 1 14
Threads 1 14
Chip lithography 180 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 80 Watt

K6-2+ 500ACZM has 515.4% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 24 years, 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between K6-2+ 500ACZM and M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between K6-2+ 500ACZM and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD K6-2+ 500ACZM
K6-2+ 500ACZM
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
M4 Max (14 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate K6-2 500ACZM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate M4 Max (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about K6-2+ 500ACZM or M4 Max (14 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.