Ultra 9 285K vs K6-2+ 450ACZM

VS

Primary details

Comparing K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated50
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.81
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data32.75
Architecture codenameSharptooth (2000)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date18 April 2000 (24 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.45 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache64 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistors21 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAMD Super Socket 71851
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Depends on motherboardDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2000 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 180 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 125 Watt

K6-2+ 450ACZM has 861.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 24 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that K6-2+ 450ACZM is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between K6-2+ 450ACZM and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD K6-2+ 450ACZM
K6-2+ 450ACZM
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate K6-2 450ACZM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 114 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about K6-2+ 450ACZM or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.