EPYC 9135 vs K6-2/333ANZ

VS

Primary details

Comparing K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated96
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.27
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD K6-2no data
Power efficiencyno data17.30
Architecture codenameK6-2 (1998−1999)Turin (2024)
Release date14 June 1999 (25 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate95.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier3.5no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography0.25 µm4 nm
Die size81 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors9 Million16,630 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 1999 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32

EPYC 9135 has an age advantage of 25 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that K6-2/333ANZ is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between K6-2/333ANZ and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD K6-2/333ANZ
K6-2/333ANZ
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate K6-2/333ANZ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about K6-2/333ANZ or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.