Ryzen 3 3350U vs Itanium 9750
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1754 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9750 and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9750 and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA1248 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 2 MB + 4 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9750 and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9750 and Ryzen 3 3350U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9750 and Ryzen 3 3350U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| VT-i | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9750 and Ryzen 3 3350U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2017 | 6 January 2019 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 2 Watt |
Itanium 9750 has 100% more threads.
Ryzen 3 3350U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 8400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Itanium 9750 and AMD Ryzen 3 3350U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Itanium 9750 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3350U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
