EPYC 7773X vs Itanium 9350
Primary details
Comparing Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 21 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.47 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB L3 Cache | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1248 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 50 Bit | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 22 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 64 |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 280 Watt |
Itanium 9350 has 51.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9350 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
