Ultra 7 265 vs Itanium 9350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB L3 Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA12481851
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE50 Bitno data

Security technologies

Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 184.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Itanium 9350 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9350 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Itanium 9350
Itanium 9350
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Itanium 9350 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.