Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Itanium 9320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiencyno data5.37
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataMatisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 January 2010 (16 years ago)14 July 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed1.33 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.47 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB L3 Cache128 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA1248sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE50 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2010 14 July 2020
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 280 Watt

Itanium 9320 has 81% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Itanium 9320 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Itanium 9320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 104 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Itanium 9320 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.